Hi, Arthur,

Don't panic!
Does the Enhancement1 file truly contain a full email (including headers)? Looks to me the two entry conditions for hashes #1 and #2 aren't met which then triggers a warning as $digest hasn't been computed yet when it comes to hash #3. (which it shouldn't. Guess I'll do a 1.5.1 soon)

Otherwise I'm at a loss currently. Just checjked - runs fine on my system.

Dirk


Arthur Dent schrieb:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 06:05:52PM +0100, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Folks,

just uploaded a new version of the iXhash plugin to http://ixhash.sf.net.

[Snip]

Thanks  - I a big fan of iXhash - gets lots of stuff for me. BUT...

I just downloaded and installed the new plugin (and restarted spamd).

This is the output BEFORE the upgrade:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamSamples]$ spamassassin -D IXHASH < Enhancement1 [8498] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying Server ctyme.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52
via method 2
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52.ctyme.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying Server hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52
via method 2
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying Server generic.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52
via method 2
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52.generic.ixhash.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying Server ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52
via method 2
[8498] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
da982a0992d447ac0ce1f25391f95d52.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net

Great...

This is the output AFTER the upgrade to v.1.5

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamSamples]$ spamassassin -D IXHASH < Enhancement1 [8609] dbg: IXHASH: Using iXhash plugin
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying ctyme.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #2 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] warn: Use of uninitialized value
$Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::iXhash::digest in length at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/iXhash.pm line 330.
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value 6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b
via method 3
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.ctyme.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #2 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #3 found in metadata, re-using
that one
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying generic.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.generic.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #2 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.generic.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #3 found in metadata, re-using
that one
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.generic.ixhash.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #2 not computed, requirements not met
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #3 found in metadata, re-using
that one
[8609] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
6be739615db54e8be5f0879777ab0c1b.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net


Should I revert to the old version or have I borked something in the
upgrade?

Thanks

AD


Reply via email to