On 8-Dec-2008, at 00:44, mouss wrote:
DKIM is not a blacklister, but a whitelist based on if sender really
use monster.com mta mail server or not :)
indeed.
Checking my SPAM folder it seems that a LOT of spam gets DKIM_VERIFIED
I have tons that look, essentially, like this:
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=main; d=etacbase07.com;
b=eVw4gychbdyZ01HyEGfBa7zjoxxjaaqVy
+vHu9UeYI7+aKC971+ySnccA4klNvcBOIkAbiSgWl4YWXCn5SrkEg==;
h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:List-Unsubscribe:Mime-
Version:Content-Type;
Received: by 69.30.205.166 with SMTP id 4gki5ruu8m4116d
for <*munged*>; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:11:33 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:11:34 -0600
From: "Goya Foods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Subscriber" <*munged*>
So it looks like the only usefulness of DKIM for spam checking is
really for the big mailers like gmail, paypal, ebay, etc? This
message failed the SA check with a score over 11, so I'm not
complaining.
I have a dkim.cf that is pretty basic, I guess, but I've recently
tweaked the settings a bit:
score DKIM_VERIFIED -1.3
score DKIM_SIGNED 1
score USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -10.0
score USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL -3.3
score ENV_AND_HDR_DKIM_MATCH -0.7
score L_NOTVALID_GMAIL 3.0
score L_NOTVALID_PAY 10
I'm still testing these settings.
--
I know that you believe you understand what you think I said but I
am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I
meant.
