John Hardin writes: >On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > >> it is for short-circuit. Because likehood of being SPAM is higher than >> a Mail with virii, and because virii test needs more power, Id like to >> send to back virii test. > >You might have more success incorporating clamav through some other way >than as a SA plugin, then. Running it as a separate filter *after* SA, >assuming that the glue lets you file/discard the message based on the SA >score before running it through clamav...
It's perfectly fine to run ClamAV as a plugin and shortcircuit; that's what I do, using the plugin on the Wiki. Since Clam calls phishes "viruses", it's a good way to rescue those for the spam corpus. loadplugin ClamAV clamav.pm full CLAMAV eval:check_clamav() describe CLAMAV Clam AntiVirus detected a virus priority CLAMAV -900 score CLAMAV 20 shortcircuit CLAMAV spam --j.
