Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Jberliner wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:16:20 -0800 (PST): > >> spamassassin -D --lint > > did you check if the same happens when you run those messages thru > "spamassassin -D" and thru spamc? > >
Yes, I had already sent the message(s) to spamassassin -D and got the same results. I did not try passing them to spamc, though when I do now, it seems to replicate the problem. #spamc -c < untagged-spam-msg 0.0/4.3 #spamc -r < untagged-spam-msg (no output) # spamc -y < untagged-spam-msg (no output) Note that when I pass hams to spamc, they seem to always trigger the rules. A couple of things about the non-tagged messages: they usually feature a spoofed sender address identical to the recipient, but not always: so, e.g. From: <m...@mydomain.com> To: m...@mydomain.com. And, in looking at the message headers, a few things are consistently different about the bad messages. I don't know if this is because SA or qmail-scanner rewrite the headers or what... - they are missing a "Date:" header - The order of the last few header lines is somewhat different - and of course X-Spam-Report always returns the symbol _SUMMARY_ instead of any tests processed. - the number of SA hits is always reported as 0.0, which should be a very rare occurrence given the custom rules I've added to help troubleshoot. Thanks for any further insights or suggestions. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamd-skipping-tests-tp21448225p21463477.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
