On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:34 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:01, McDonald, Dan wrote: > > I would like to add a test that scores a From: not in the freemail > > list, with a Reply-to: in the freemail list. Shouldn't be worth > > much (maybe .5) but I think it will get enough to push some of > > these advance-fee scams over the top. > > > > Anyone hacked up that plugin to do that? > > meta FREE_ADVANCE_FEE (!FREEMAIL_FROM && FREEMAIL_REPLYTO) > describe FREE_ADVANCE_FEE Meta: reply to is a freemail domain > score FREE_ADVANCE_FEE 0.5 > > not what you wanted ?
Nope. FREEMAIL_REPLYTO is only true if there is a FREEMAIL_FROM and the reply-to: header or the body contains a different freemail address. I want a rule to fire for FREEMAIL_REPLYTO even if the From: header does not contain a freemail address. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
