Andrzej Adam Filip schrieb: >> Speaking of which, it may actually make sense to use all of >> dnswl.org's entries as trusted_networks-entries... > > Do you want it even for DNSWL trust levels of "none" and "low"? > It would be a "brave" suggestion :-)
Surprisingly, I *am* suggesting to do exactly this :-) trusted_networks really means "trusted not to be run by spammers themselves", or "trusted to report Received:-headers without deliberate falsification. Hopefully, we do not have servers on dnswl.org that are run by spammers, otherwise it would be very important to have them removed in the first place. I created the export job, one file per trust score, so that you can play away: rsync --times rsync1.dnswl.org::dnswl/sa/* /some/destination/path ATTENTION: Such a huge trusted_networks list will slow down SpamAssassin to an unacceptable level. It *will* eat 100% of your CPU, unless you applied the patches for bug 5931: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5931 Also, read the comments about duplicate entries (as there are quite a few of them). -- Matthias
