On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:32 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-03-02 12:30:34, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > How so? 'cause his score is lower than yours? Both these samples have
> > been caught and scored 7.1. Jake didn't complain about FNs but asked for
> > hints on *additional* rules. Well, that wasn't exactly a constructive
> > comment anyway.
> >
> > Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee yet...
>
> I have a Debian Standard installation and this two messages would be
> blocked with a score of 4.5. If someone get a much lower score, it
> sound like it has something lowered...
Michelle, please read the thread in context. The original score is
lower, though not even close to *much* lower. Also, your Spamhaus ZEN
hit depends on the time of the scan. It didn't hit that day.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
