On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 23:58 +0200, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> > May I ask, why? Just curious.
>
> I bet with a friend about spammers and i have an virtual server which i
> don't need anymore - the contract ends in may - so i used some domains for
> spam honeypots because their mx-records are not in use.
Ah, thanks -- I see.
> I don't get any viruses - nothing - only mails for small blue ..... (i
> can't use this word because of spam filters) and mails for investments
> into stocks.
Hmm, weird. Spammers do use malware to acquire their bot-nets. Moreover,
they do use the very same network for spreading the malware just as they
send out spam -- at the very least, malware drop-off links.
Anyway, yes, you can say pills. Pills, pills, pills! ;) You can even
talk about Viagra. At least with a system like SA.
I am pretty confident though that I will get a bad bounce by that one
user of the braindead, bare-word scanner Microsoft Antigen. Time to get
him off our list, I guess...
> The configuration is only spamassassin - no rbl - no virus scanners - the
> domains are set all on catch all.
My bet is... You will see spam to thisisonlytestmessage@ and mangled
variants thereof. :)
> It is an experiment - only for 1 month.
What's the bet?
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
