On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 17:03, Yet Another Ninja <sa-l...@alexb.ch> wrote: > On 4/27/2009 5:47 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> >> These days there is basically no rule development going on, it seems. >> Justin's sought rules are the only ones really being updated, and >> that's because they're computer generated. :) >> >> That's actually something else I'm sad about -- we had such a huge >> corpus of mail, I would really like to have seen something that took >> advantage of it. >> >> >> So anyway ... Yeah, IMO, if more people don't get involved, and >> specifically to work on rule development, SA is going to completely >> stagnate. > > Theo, > For the same reasons, SARE lost interest. > > > One for sure, the process to submit rules is complicated and cumbersome, > unless you have a backdoor. > > SARE had a nice system where you could submit a rule via email and got the > masscheck results via email. Sadly all the boxes which did this are dead. I > wonder if the SA masscheckers could be taught to do something like that. It > could possibly inspire ppl if they see fast results and publishing of new 0 > hour rules.
actually, I _did_ come up with one of those, but nobody used it :( http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PreflightByMail btw, don't bother trying it now -- I turned it off again after it was never used. --j.
