David B Funk wrote: > Umm, I guess you didn't understand what the ".phish.icaen.uiowa.edu" part > of "address.phish.icaen.uiowa.edu" ment.
D'oh! Sorry, doing too many things at once. You're right, that worked for me. However, you still have Mike's issue of 63 characters per label and 255 characters total, the support issue, plus all the wasted bandwidth with such a long name. Also, I'd be hesitant dealing with certain special characters, technically legal but potentially dangerous, like [...@*"'?%,] et al. > Unless you've got an obsolete version of software this does work. > In bind if you use the "check-names ignore" option for that zone it > does -NOT- require munging. (I'm running mine that way, so I know > that it works.) Isn't there a reason they recently re-enabled check-names by default? > Have you followed the development of the SURBL service? They > explicitly switched to the bit-mask format to reduce DNS load. Obviously not. Interesting.
