> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I think that scanning for viruses is much faster and should be done > > first, preferrably oustide of SA.
On 04.05.09 11:05, Adam Katz wrote: > Are you suggesting that ClamAV is faster by an order of magnitude that > exceeds the massively high ratio of non-virus spam to non-spam > viruses? Yes, although I have no evidence. Maybe turning on logging of clean files will tell me. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.
