>> Not sure why everyone else sees MISSING_DATE, MISSING_SUBJECT, etc.
>
> Bad copy-n-paste for their checking. From what I recall from my quick
> look earlier, your pastebins are OK.
Yup, one count of that on each of our behalfs. Here's my corrected
first email scan:
Content analysis details: (12.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ------------------ ------------------------------------------
3.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 t...
[score: 1.0000]
0.1 KHOP_SENDER_BOT Message sent from a bulk service or bot
0.3 KHOP_NO_FULL_NAME Sender does not have both first and las...
1.7 RCVD_IN_JMF_BL RBL: Relay listed in JunkEmailFilter BL...
[65.60.43.41 listed in hostkarma.junkem...
0.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo&id=ma...
2.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL bla...
[URIs: mystrugglingbuddy.info]
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence...
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.8 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above...
[cf: 100]
2.0 KHOP_DNSBL_BUMP Hits a trusted non-overlapping DNSBL
Very interesting that DCC_CHECK didn't trigger for me; it is certainly
enabled on my tests and received mail is tripping it... Maybe the fuzzy
checksums have been since removed from the DCC servers?
