On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 18:32 -0400, Jeff Mincy wrote: > From: Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> > > Wouldn't it be easier to run another spamd on a different machine for > rule development and testing? Or perhaps just running as a different > 'test' user, and then ignore log messages for that user in the statistics. > I'm about to set that up today and get it integrated with cvs.
> > Would anybody else find this a useful feature too? > > I've sometimes wanted the other way - eg get more debugging output for > a particular message. > I think these are two sides of the same coin: if spamc could pass debugging control flags to spamd via a message wrapper then it would be simple to add the ability to control logging as well. Martin
