Theo Van Dinter wrote: > SpamAssassin is not a porn filter, whatever the variety. > Yes it is. If it's unsolicited - then it's spam. By that logic, there should be no textual regex rules - SA should only use RBLs and Bayes.
BTW, the originator was referring to changing an existing official rule: FS_TEEN_BAD (/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf) I would add 'f\*\*k' to the rule too... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
