On 30-Jun-2009, at 19:38, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Yes, that *might* result in images being loaded off the net auto-
matically, depending on your MUA settings. Hence the "safe". But it
really makes reviewing harder, having the user scroll and klick each
single spam.
Erm.. I don't understand how report-safe 1 means scrolling and
clicking each spam? The vast majority of tagged spam can be discarded
without ever looking at the actual message in the attachment. And if a
message is mistagged, opening the attachment gives you the entire
original message with no SA tags at all.
Recovering from report_safe 0 is a piece of cake, too. Just get rid of
the X-Spam headers. Done. What's destructive about that?
That's well beyond most MUAs and most users.
--
You know, Calculus is sort of like measles. Once you've had it, you
probably won't get it again, and you're glad of it. -- W. Carr
