On Wed, July 22, 2009 17:04, Justin Mason wrote: > when that was set a couple of years back, PBL had a few FPs -- the FP > rate has dropped greatly since then, going by recent ruleqa results. > go ahead and bump it up.
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage#202 What do the 127.0.0.* Return Codes mean? can qa use seperate return codes to see how it compose to corpus ?, if there is a big diff there it makes sense to do seperate rbl testing in sa for each return code -- xpoint
