I havent tried with sa-compile yet - I can give it a shot --
Henrik K wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:41:47AM -0700, poifgh wrote: >> >> Henrik K wrote: >> > >> > Yeah, given that my 4x3Ghz box masscheck peaks at 22 msgs/sec, without >> > Net/AWL/Bayes. But that's the 3.3 SVN ruleset.. wonder what version was >> > used >> > and any nondefault rules/settings? Certainly sounds strange that 1 core >> > could top out the same. Anyone else have figures? Maybe I've borked >> > something myself.. >> > >> >> The problem is not with 22 being a low number, but when we have other >> free > > I did not say it was a problem. I was just wondering how fast CPU/memory > you > have, since my 3Ghz AMD doesn't seem to keep up. > > I just tested with fresh 3.2.5 install, and running 500 mail mbox with > single core resulted in 11 msgs / sec. Then I used sa-compile, and it > raised > to 15. Did you use it also? > > Of course your mailbox could be a lot different, so hard to compare. > >> cores to run different SA parallely why doesnt the throughput scale >> linearly >> .. I expect for 8 cores with 8 SA running simultaneously the number to be >> 150+ msgs/sec but it is 1/3rd at 50 msgs/sec > > Anyway as people have already said here, disable AWL: > > use_auto_whitelist 0 > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Parallelizing-Spam-Assassin-tp24751958p24765570.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
