On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:58 +0100, Cedric Knight wrote:
> BTW (2), maybe I overstated the case for URIBL_RED. It seems to vary
> somewhat in its reliability, and probably shouldn't be scored >1.0.
> Still non-zero though, I propose.
Did you read the URIBL docs, specifically Usage and About? The former
doesn't even list RED, which is pretty much identical to them advising
not to score it (anything even half significant). The latter clearly
states to use at your own risk.
The stock score is a default, and quite sensible. Feel free to customize
the score.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
