On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 06:23:22PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 30-Aug-2009, at 22:28, Henrik K wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:10:23PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: >>> On 29-Aug-2009, at 11:47, R-Elists wrote: >>>> have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production >>>> servers >>>> to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release? >>> >>> Er.. hopefully no one did this on a production server. Or if they did >>> they are not really understanding 'alpha' and are willing to lose >>> mail, >>> or worse. >> >> How is SA going to lose your mail? > > Dunno, but it is ALPHA. You know what that means? I specifically means > it is not ready to be relied upon. BETA means that it is not ready for > production servers, and ALPHA is pre-beta.
Yeah normal users obviously should just use "stable" OS packages and don't bother with anything requiring effort. But any SA enthusiast that somewhat follows SA development should know that SVN has been "stable" for quite a while and has benefits over 3.2 (especially when using something like amavisd-new). I find your post just unnecessary FUD.
