Clunk Werclick wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:05 -0600, LuKreme wrote: >> On 14-Sep-2009, at 05:24, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: >>> If the OP cannot refrain from that sort of foul language when >>> presented with counter arguments then please ban. The list would be >>> far happier IMHO. >> Based on his reply to Matus I put him on my 'soft' kill list. >> >> (soft because all it does is mark his messages as read when they are >> received, so I still have them… but chances are I never see them). >> >> I did have to lookup his "real" address >> clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk >> so I could mark both his throw-away gmail address and his 'real' >> address. I found it in my postfix spool. >> >> Still, based on his ignorance and his volatile behavior *I* certainly >> don't have any interest in his getting helped, and I don't have to >> read his xenophobic abuse ever again. > Man, I'm going to lose *so* much sleep about that. From what I have > read, the majority of you are a bunch of gay arse lovers up eachother. > And fuckwits too boot. > > I hope you die ejaculating up each others arse holes.
So how far does someone have to go before getting banned from the list? Is this not far enough yet? Bill
