On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jose Luis Marin Perez < jolumape...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sirs > > A few moments ago I noticed that SA was not assigned any score for SPAM > emails, reviewing the log I see this: > > *...@400000004aba627c21bee88c [25630] info: spamd: got connection over > /tmp/spamd.sock > @400000004aba627c21dbc344 [10362] info: prefork: child states: > BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB > @400000004aba627c21de4f9c [10362] info: prefork: server reached > --max-children setting, consider raising it > @400000004aba627c21f6a9fc [29083] info: spamd: got connection over > /tmp/spamd.sock > @400000004aba627c22137ce4 [10362] info: prefork: child states: > BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB > @400000004aba627c23420234 [25630] info: spamd: processing message < > 20090923123800.35362610...@mail6.shermanstravel.com> for > cama...@qnet.com.pe:89 > @400000004aba627c235e293c [10362] info: prefork: server reached > --max-children setting, consider raising it > @400000004aba627c26639554 [29083] info: spamd: processing message < > 20090923174010.29472.qm...@mkt1.lan.com> for cbr...@qnet.com.pe:89 > @400000004aba62832e01e694 [10362] info: prefork: child states: > BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB > @400000004aba62832e01ee64 [10362] info: prefork: server reached > --max-children setting, consider raising it > tail: `/var/log/qmail/spamd/current' has been replaced; following end of > new file* > > cpu > > *Cpu(s): 89.2% us, 9.8% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa, 1.0% hi, 0.0% > si* > > memory > > * total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 501 319 181 0 22 78 > -/+ buffers/cache: 218 282 > Swap: 1027 38 988* > > Load > * 13:02:27 up 35 days, 21:49, 4 users, load average: 21.76, 21.17, 17.37 > * > > > Was solved by restarting SA > > This is due to lack of server resources? > > Thanks > > Jose Luis> From: <list...@abbacomm.net> > maybe. probably not. who knows? why was your system load at 21? maybe you just have way too many instances of spamassasin running maybe you've got your system configured in a really inefficient way. how could we know? > list...@abbacomm.net > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Problems with high spam > > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:27:38 -0700 > > > > > > > > > > but it could be nice that sare rules was checked in the mass > > > check for 3.3.x to get the best rules out in new rule sets > > > > > > or would some other try this ? > > > > > > -- > > > xpoint > > > > Benny! > > > > excellent idea in general... > > > > will those in authority in SA team please act upon this and tell us in > some > > positive way what appears to be best to keep out of SARE and what is > not... > > > > much of the time it seems like we are double dipping with some rules and > > something needs to change... > > > > i realize it can be different from site to site yet maybe if we had some > > extra info we could all make better decisions eh??? > > > > :-) > > > > - rh > > > > ------------------------------ > Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live > Spaces. It's easy! Try > it!<http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us> >
