On 10/7/2009 5:00 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
> It seems then the only way to feed a URIBL fresh .cn domains would be a
spam trap. This proposed URIBL would be extremely easy to build on the
infrastructure of existing trap-based DNSBL's like PSBL, HOSTKARMA or
SEM. My own volume of spam is too small to do this.
you haven't really looked into Spamhaus data & SA rules, have you?
have you looked into SURBL/URIBL's data & datafeeds?
what's the deal here? do you not represent RedHat?
have no acccess to RH spam data?
just can't imagine RH can't provide itself or the community with plenty
of spam data.
Opinions of this proposal?
sorry - imo, reinventing the wheeel some time too late....
