Hi, > What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is not > 100% (or even 99%, IIRC) spam.
Incorrect in that at least one of the rules fired when they should not have, making the valid email to be marked as spam. > there's a couple of things here. > > First, for some reason you have DKIM_SIGNED but not DKIM_VERIFIED, which > seems odd as this looks like a legit gmail message with a legit DKIM > signature. So there's one thing to check. Why is that? How do I go about figuring that out? > I'm not sure which of those scored what. Then there is the fact that your > custom rule "L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL" hit. If that's the same rule I see in the > list archives, that scored 2.5 and pushed this email firmly into being > tagged as spam. Yes, that looks like it. It was posted by Dan McDonald on August 25th to the list. It's a meta: meta L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL !DKIM_VERIFIED && __L_FROM_GMAIL && !__L_VIA_ML priority L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL 500 score L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL 2.5 I've set it to 0.5 for now. Ideas on tracking down the DKIM_VERIFIED issue would be appreciated. > Maybe adjust that score, or adjust the assumptions that caused that rule to > be added to your config? > > This IS a gmail message, right? So your unverified-gmail custom rule is in > error. Yes, that's correct. I think you've identified the root of the problem. Thanks so much. Best regards, Alex
