Warren Togami wrote: > On 11/23/2009 07:34 PM, Adam Katz wrote: >> Unless there are objections, I'm going to add two tests to my sandbox: >> >> RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM, a new (to us) DNSBL populated by the same source as >> the original [N]iXhash zone, with results on intra2net that look quite >> promising: 72.98:0.12 spam:ham (PSBL has 48.69:0.36), >> http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/blacklist.php_dnsbl=RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM.html > > Is intra2net measuring the blacklists without lastexternal as their > suggested spamassassin config suggests? If so then their results are > suspect.
It's probably similar to http://stats.dnsbl.com/ in that it doesn't do a good job of its ham numbers but its relative spam counts are fair. Only one way to find out...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
