On 25.11.09 03:23, jdow wrote:
> Having a little help might help them maintain a better product.
> But (that bitter word), the basic concept is broken. If the spammer
> can make more money than it costs to get on the Habeas whitelist
> then they will pull the same trick I've seen here in California in the
> construction trades.

Some time ago they used to sue spammers, according to discussion here they
don't anymore. Maybe that's one of their biggest problems.

> A business owner creates a new business, incorporates it, accepts a job,
> and when the job goes sour bankrupt and fold the shell corporation. The
> same trick is available for the HABEAS spoof. Hence, I figure the concept
> is unworkable on its face.

Btw, would be nice from you if you quoted mail you are replying to.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take
to take effect. [OK]

Reply via email to