Am 2009-11-23 17:08:11, schrieb LuKreme: > On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> > wrote: > > >Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers... > > We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong > indicator of spam. It does not appear in legitimate mail.
Here too.
> I don't know who these legitimate marketers are, but I don't feel
> I'm missing anything.
I do not get very much HABEAS spam, but arround 2000 per year. Not a
singel one was legitimate. What is th difference between a spamer and a
"legitimate" marketer if I even do not know both?
By definition: Both are non-welcome @me.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/> Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/> Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/> 50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de 67100 Strabourg/France
IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ #328449886 Tel. FR: +33 6 61925193
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
