Per Jessen wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On 30.11.09 16:41, Per Jessen wrote: >>> I could, but it won't help - rest assured it has the headers. >>> Anyway, how about a way to make spamd refuse to process a message >>> when it appears to to have any? >> >> which MTA do you use? How do you plug SA in? > > MTA is postfix, I call spamd directly using the spamc protocol (but > not spamc). > >> where do those messages come from? > > For instance a couple from msg.oleane.net, but it varies. >
I forgot to add - when the mail is sent through and I later run it through spamassassin mnaually, everything works fine(!) - so something happens in spamd or before. That's why I want spamd to refuse processing such that the message will remain queued in postfix. /Per Jessen, Zürich
