> -----Original Message----- > From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com] > Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2009 4:59 p.m. > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list > > On 16-Dec-2009, at 16:11, Michael Hutchinson wrote: > > So far only 1 person on this list has claimed to have been hit by > Spam that has been let through by the Habeas rules in SA. > > > I'm the only one? Really? That doesn’t jibe with my memory, but I'm not > scanning the entire list to prove you wrong. > > Really? > > Yeah, sorry, not buying it. >
OK I am probably wrong, but the list certainly hasn't been inundated with people saying that they have that exact issue. Come on, how many people have been hit with Spam, to find that the only reason it has gotten through their Gateway is because of a Habeas rule? I only remember Richard complaining about this. Everyone else started carrying on about the Habeas rules being present at all, when it is more than within their power to disable those rules. Buy what you want, but I'm not selling anything. Cheers, Mike
