On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST) John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Christian Brel wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:49:41 -0600 > > Daniel J McDonald <dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:49 +0000, Christian Brel wrote: > >>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:44:32 -0500 > >>> "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <spamassas...@dostech.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Please stop beating the -4 and -8 horse. We agree. > >>> > >>> Then fix it and show who really is in charge of this project? > >> > >> It's been fixed. Don't you know how to use bugzilla? > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf?r1=891460&r2=891459&pathrev=891460 > >> > >> The new scores will come out in 3.3.0, RC1 is very soon... > > > > +score RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED 0.0 -3.0 0.0 -3.0 > > +score RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE 0.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 > > > > This is 'fixed'? > > In the absence of evidence to the contrary, yes. > > If it's that big a problem for you in real life, then you should be > able to provide FNs to the masscheck corpora that will _prove_ these > scores are too generous. > > We understand your philosophical objection. Providing hard evidence > of FNs will go much further towards making your point than name > calling will. > The name calling being? -- This e-mail and any attachments may form pure opinion and may not have any factual foundation. Please check any details provided to satisfy yourself as to suitability or accuracy of any information provided. Data Protection: Unless otherwise requested we may pass the information you have provided to other partner organisations.
