RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> writes: > I wonder why you are learning through spamc at all. IIRC you observered > that sa-learn was a little slower than in your previous SA version, you > tried spamc and found it to be slower and more trouble than using > sa-learn on a directory. sa-learn AFAIK has no limit, so why not go > back to sa-learn?
With bigger amounts of e-mails spamc is slower as sa-learn, but up to 15 mails spamc is faster then sa-learn. So I made it now so that when there are less as 15 e-mails in a folder that spamc is used and otherwise sa-learn. It can save up to 10 seconds pro folder. In my situation not very important, but I like to do things in the 'correct' way. When someone is going to use my script on a server where there is a lot to learn and regularly, then the current script would be a lot better as the old script. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
