Am 14.01.2010 15:48, schrieb LuKreme: > On 14-Jan-2010, at 07:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Indeed, that's why I would not consider it. And I assume if you do it this >> way that also means you have to scan *every* message and not only the 10% >> that make it thru normal MTA rejection by policy. > > > I suppose it depends on exactly where the milter runs. I would certainly not > consider running it before checks to RBLS, internal blacklists, and HELO > checks. > As i said no Problem on mid range traffic mailservers and spamass-milters and timeouts etc ( i.e with traditional postfix rbl/helo etc checks ), after all you can use rbl milters , greylist milters etc in chain as you like i myself use dkim milters this way the biggest vote for milters are rejecting on smtp income which makes life much more easy in a few setups
-- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
