Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> > Imho, SPF does NOT break forwarding. > > On 11.02.10 19:37, Per Jessen wrote: >> Hmm, the SRS people seem to disagree: >> >> http://www.openspf.org/SRS : SPF "breaks" email forwarding. > > I think those quotes say it all. SRS is a way to create correct and > trackable forwarding, SPF or not.
Well, I'll just note that SRS was invented exclusively because of SPF, not because of any critical/actual problems in email forwarding. What is hindering SPF adoption is also a distinct lack of development on the SRS front, notably in getting a workable/performant setup for a major mailserver such as postfix. > The forwarding without changing sender is imho already broken, > however the breakage gets visible with SPF adoption. > Just my opinion, but I would tend to think that SPF broke it then. /Per Jessen, Zürich
