Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 11/02/2010 19:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
All I can see above is a long list of dubious predictions of what
spammers would do if everybody used the same system as me. I can't be
bothered with this thread anymore.
You can't be bothered - yet you continued responding to someone
else on this thread.. Uh huh.
Sounds like you know I'm right and you can't think of a logical
defense (since there isn't one) so your going to turn and run off
with your tail between your legs.
If anyone had any doubts that you weren't an inexperienced mail admin
who knows just enough to be dangerous you just dispelled them.
If you can't defend your hack in an open forum, then it's exactly as
I said, nothing new, nothing revolutionary, just a cheap hack that
only works if -one- site is doing it. I'll slip it in my file of
other cheap hacks that only work if one site is doing them. Who
knows maybe I might even have to use it one day for some border
case - but I sure as hell would never be foolish enough to try and
defend it. These hacks simply scream "I got mine and I don't give
a damn if you got yours", hardly the attitude for an Internet admin
to have.
What exactly do you think the SA ruleset is, Mike? It is nothing more
than a "dubious predictions of what spammers would do"
Good Lord, and on top of that, a hijacked thread, too! <headshake>
Ted
