On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:11 -0600, David B Funk wrote: > The other special rule name is the hidden rule, one that starts with "__". > Those rules are assigned a score of 0 but do run regardless and aren't > reported in the scoring report. The intention there is that they're used > to form meta-rules when you need to combine a number of factors and only > want the final result to score/report. > When developing hidden rules it's easy to make them visable for debugging > purposes, mearly prepend a 'T' to the name which turns them into visible > testing rules.
This is the wrong approach. The non-scoring sub-rules with a double underscore prefix are meant for meta rules. Making them "visible" by transforming them into T_ testing rules sure would make them visible in the *default* SA report headers, but comes with an enormous downside: You have to rename *all* occurrences in all meta rules using them. Moreover, it's pretty much a rule design decision to not have them visible. If -- for debugging purpose -- you want to have non-scoring sub-rules visible, rather than renaming them, the best approach is (a) either to have a look at the -D debug output, or (b) to add a header with the _SUBTESTS(,)_ template tag. Depending on whether you just need some ad-hoc checking, or on a broader basis. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}