Kelson wrote: > SPF works great as a selective whitelist in SpamAssassin. (And I don't > mean whitelisting all SPF passes. That would be stupid. I mean > whitelisting mail coming from domain X, but only when it passes SPF > and demonstrates that yes, it really came from domain X.) > > I'd say that what you found is *not* that SPF itself is a disaster, > but that enforcing SPF by rejecting failures is a disaster.
+1 /Per Jessen, Zürich
