d.hill wrote:
>
>>Quoting Jeff_47:
>
>>>
>>> I have an odd situation - it seems like I must be missing something but
>>> I
>>> don't know what.
>>>
>>> In my local.cf, I had the following lines:
>>> dns_available yes
>>> skip_rbl_checks 0
>>>
>>> I noticed that no RBL checks were being run.
>>>
>>> If I change dns_available to "test" or comment out the line (same
>>> function),
>>> now the RBL checks are run as expected.
>>
>>In SA v3.3.0:
>>
>>Commenting out the line results in using the default setting. The
>>default setting for 'dns_available' is 'test'. Perhaps there is a DNS
>>issue on your server.
>
> Thanks, I understood the part about commenting it out.
>
> But my question is this: since 'dns_available test' results in all the
> rbls being run, then doesn't that mean that the test is succeeding? In
> which case, how is that different than my entering 'dns_available yes'.
>
> In other words, a successful test run by 'dns_available test' is not
> producing the same result as 'dns_available yes' - that's where I was
> surprised.
>
>>'skip_rbl_checks' is defaulted to '0'. You shouldn't have to include it.
>
> Right. When I was troubleshooting and not getting expected results, I
> added it to be explicit.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RBLs-not-run-when-dns_available%3Dyes--tp27881526p27881823.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
