Karsten,
You're correct in they both have scores. I was not paying close
attention to the headers and also you're correct about my confusion
with defualt SA headers and Amavisd-new headers. I didn't realize
Amavisd used custom SA headers for messages.
Thanks for clarifying this!
-Carlos
On 3/12/10, Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:28 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
>> I guess I am still lost. SA appears to be working and everything looks
>> fine however my emails don't appear to be getting a score and I don't
>> understand how that link applies to why SA isn't setting a score on my
>> messages when it is clearly passing mail to and from Postfix.
>>
>> My headers look like:
>>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on
>> mail.iamghost.com
>> X-Spam-Level: *
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.3
>> tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.0
>
> The default SA headers.
>
>> The above snipper shows no score as I would expect to see below from a
>> different server:
>>
>> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>> X-Spam-Score: -1.15
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5
>> tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449] autolearn=no
>
> Headers based on the SA analysis, but NOT added by SA but a third-party
> glue application that itself calls SA. Amavisd in this case.
>
>> Am I missing something in my local.cf that is not properly scoring all
>> incoming messages?
>
> You really are confused about the word "score", aren't you? Check both
> headers again, and you'll notice they both clearly show a score. The
> total score the message... scored. ;)
>
> The latter, the Amavisd headers, *additionally* show each rule's score
> in the tests section. Any chance that tiny, merely cosmetic difference
> is what you are after? And perceive as "missing scores"?
>
>
> If so, you can customize the SA headers (as added by SA), to look more
> like the Avamisd ones. In particular, there are Template Tags showing
> rules hit plus their respective scores...
>
>
> --
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
