On 3/16/2010 8:14 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Phill,
>
>
>> def_whitelist_from_rcvd *[email protected] posts.freecycle.org
>>
>
>> Received: from bulkmail2.freecycle.org ([95.172.20.170])
>> by mscip02.mailsentry.net.au with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2010 17:51:21 +1100
>> From: "frances.dejong" <[email protected]>
>>
>
>> Can anyone explain why the whitelist entry isn't preventing this from
>> being tagged as spam?
>>
> posts.freecycle.org != bulkmail2.freecycle.org
>
> Mark
>
>
They also need to set [220.233.2.146] as a part of trusted_networks (and
internal_networks, if that has been declared at all), Currently all SPF
and whitelist_from_rcvd's are going to be checked against a host of
"146.2.233.220.static.exetel.com.au", which looks to be an upstream
relay that all mail comes in through.
You can tell this from the SPF line:
* 0.7 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
* [SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=post-1601702-2890135%40bounces.freecycle.org;ip=220.233.2.146;r=ash.edwards.home]
