On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 06:23 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > I'm currently optimising my private rule set and have just replaced the
> > unlimited globs '*' and '+' in body rules with {0,n} and {1,n}
> > respectively, where 'n' is a suitably small number.
> >
> > Is it worth doing the same to uri rules or are they already sufficiently
> > restricted that unlimited globs can't affect SA's performance?
>
> URIs are already restricted to the URI itself so you don't need to worry.
> You might want to do them anyway for consistency's sake, and to help
> develop the habit.
>
Thanks for the confirmation.
I appreciate what you're saying about consistency, but against that they
do make the pattern less readable.
Martin
