On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 02:05 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote: > > > On 22 April 2010 00:44, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com> wrote: > I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam > and one > for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have > become > slower and slower. For instance stats from last night below. > Anyone with > any ideas on how to speed things up? > > Email: 62 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: -16.94 AvgScanTime: > 21.25 sec > Spam: 17 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: 35.71 AvgScanTime: > 23.12 sec > Ham: 45 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: -36.82 AvgScanTime: > 20.54 sec > > For instance my scan times about two weeks ago were: > > Email: 58 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: -12.38 AvgScanTime: > 11.36 sec > Spam: 16 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: 85.06 > AvgScanTime: 8.52 sec > Ham: 42 Autolearn: 0 AvgScore: -49.50 AvgScanTime: > 12.45 sec > > Spam > http://pastebin.com/fhd3XwHp > > Ham > http://pastebin.com/jbSD894i > > Any advice would be appreciated. > > Chris > > -- > KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C > > > What version of SA and what rules (extra or otherwise) are you > running?
3.3.0 Standard rulesets plus: http://pastebin.com/UK68S0L4 > > Anything else on the box in question slower? Clam was running really slow and sucking a bunch of memory however, the problem there was found to be that I had a mail.cvd and main.cld db, I removed the .cld file and it seemed to speed up somewhat. > > you run a local caching nameserver on the SA box? Yes, named is running > You run sa-update frequently? Yes, every four hours > > Does a debug show any obvious place where it's slow? > dbg: async: timing: 3.375 . dns:A:3.169.13.200.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net. See http://pastebin.com/7upp4BCp -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
