> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > But, anyway, I see SA 3.3.1 comes with a very good HTMLEval plugin.
> However,
> > it seems to me that it misses a way to, in example, count the length
> of the
> > text commented out with respect to the uncommented one and eventually
> > trigger a rule if the ratio is above a given threshold.
> >
> > Do you think such a rule could be somehow useful? Is there anything
> close to
> > it?
>
> I don't know of anything in the stock rules, but in response to missed
> spam reported by customers:
>
> rawbody LONG_COMMENT m|<!--[^>{};]{200,}-->|
> describe LONG_COMMENT HTML comment with 200+ characters of "content"
> score LONG_COMMENT 1.25
> rawbody DUMB_COMMENT_1 m|<!--\n?\s*\d+\s*\n?-->|
> describe DUMB_COMMENT_1 HTML comment with bare chunk of numbers
> score DUMB_COMMENT_1 1.25
> rawbody DUMB_COMMENT_2 m|<!--\n?\s*(?:-{72}\n){2,}-+\n?\s*-->|
> describe DUMB_COMMENT_2 HTML comment consisting of several lines of
> dashes
> score DUMB_COMMENT_2 1.25
> rawbody BACK2BACK_COMMENT m|--!><!--[\n\s\w]+--!><!--|
> describe BACK2BACK_COMMENT HTML structure that looks a lot like
> back-to-back empty comments
> score BACK2BACK_COMMENT 1.75
I see the relevant message don't trigger these rules, since the xml comments
in it are carefully interspersed in it: strings in each comment are shorter
than 200 characters.
> (Of course, now that I've published them they'll go totally useless...
> <g>)
Sorry for voiding your efforts... :)
Giampaolo
>
> -kgd
