On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:50:32 -0400 Bowie Bailey <bowie_bai...@buc.com> wrote:
> > The reason I was trying to tweak it, maybe I'm going about it > > wrong, but spamd winds up timing out a lot. Then people call and > > say there messages were not delivered or delayed etc... > > That may be a consequence of the swap usage. Lower the number of > children until you do not see any swap usage. OTOH if you do want to push the system to its limits make sure you are using the default spamd prefork algorithm, and not round-robin.
