On Monday 31 May 2010 16:13:24 Per Jessen wrote: > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > interesting that sa 3.3.1 only scores this as a +1 score. must mean > > it doesn't match a lot of spam vs ham. > > Must also mean that it is not an issue in SA 3.3, good. In my case, the > email is not spam as such, I suspect the leading blank is just a > programming error.
Looks fine with 3.3.1, seems the leading space is stripped and blacklisting works. Mark
