Am 03.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Kris Deugau: > Tarvo Kurm wrote: >> Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have >> drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin >> or spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have >> RCVD_IN rules matched _almost_ never. I'm suspicious of the >> UNPARSABLE_RELAY match, but not sure what causes it. > > Milters typically see the message before any Received: headers are added > by the local MTA. As a result, the milter itself needs to add a > synthetic one that SA can use. > > Unfortunately, this synthetic header seems to be a lot harder to > generate than you might think. I've heard reports now and then for > several years now that spamass-milter still hasn't quite got this ironed > out. My own preferred milter, MIMEDefang, has also had intermittent > problems generating a correct Received: header to pass to SA. > > The fact that RBL rules are not firing, and you're getting > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, says to me that *something* is wrong with the > generated header you're getting. > > Check and see if there's a way you can get spamass-milter to keep the > message with the generated header somewhere so you can compare what's > actually generated with the live header Postfix adds later, and which > you see in your mailbox. > >> There has been a bug in spamass-milter which might or might not be >> relevant, but as far as i can see, it's been fixed in the debian >> package... >> (See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510665 ) > > Fixed in the version you're running, or just unstable/testing? > > -kgd whatever, i am using spamass-milter since years without any trouble with local files, with mysql on test bed also no errors perhaps check all config of all parts
-- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria