Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
>
> So when you confirmed by running sa-learn --dump magic previously, did
> you first su to the user in question? The Bayes database does exist in
> the user's $HOME/.spamassassin/, right?
>
Yes, I had su'ed to that user and yes, they have their own bayes_seen,
bayes_toks, etc. in $HOME/.spamassassin
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
>
> Despite running per-user, site-wide Bayes DB still is possible IIRC, if
> you e.g. use an SQL backend.
>
>
No, we're not using an SQL backend and every users has their own bayes
database.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, since you still get BAYES_00 on these, you really should have a
> close look at the tokens Bayes considers most confident. And why. With
> some training, it most certainly at least should level up near BAYES_50,
> not stay at 00. The tokens should help tell you why.
>
>
OK, will do.
Thanks again for your help Karsten.
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Text-contained-in-HTML-comments-causing-BAYES_00-to-classify-as-non-spam-tp29342874p29351738.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
