On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:30:17 +0100 RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400 > Matt Kettler <mkettler...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > 1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's > > a script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist > > forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps on entries, so > > expiry isn't possible at present). > > I don't think AWL really needs timestamps. It could be maintained by > scaling down the count/token values and discarding entries where the > count rounds-down to zero. That should be count/total-score not count/token.
