> On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the > > actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them. > > > > That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta > > rules, effectively discarding all fresh sub-rule matches. > > > > > > Bottom line: If the dedicated sought channel is more up-to-date and > > updated more frequently, using that one in *addition* to (faster) aging > > stock rules currently needs careful hacks -- to preserver the precious > > meta. > > > > Or, well, any SA or channel provided method, to tweak the order. SA > > method would be a new feature. Channel method would be a rename, to come > > last in alphabetical order. > > > > Bummer. :( This is a real problem and worth filing a bug.
On 12.08.10 09:13, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Would it be a reasonable idea to always read the updates channel first > and then read any additional channels? would couse troubles if you sa-updated only official rules channel. > Or maybe have sa-update store > the updates channel as 0_updates_ so it should always be first in the list? from my point of view, including JM_* rules into SA updates was a bad idea. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
