On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:22 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
> 2010/10/12 Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de>:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:03 -1000, Julian Yap wrote:
> >> Many of the don't trigger the RCVD_IN_* rules. Does anyone implement
> >> their own private DNS black list?
> >
> > Many of what?
>
> Many of the .info emails. I guess because they are not listed on any
> RDNSBL's.
>
> >> Here's a latest one:
> >> From: "Juice Up My Income" <a...@parkrasive dot info>
> >> Subject: Sometimes timing is everything
> >> Date Received: Oct 12, 2010 13:43 PM
> >>
> >> Rules triggers:
> >> 7.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000]
> >
> > That is a rather drastic score, and generally not advised.
> >
> > However, overall it passed your spam threshold by far, no!?
>
> Yes, but my issue I guess is the the volume. Perhaps, this is a more
> 'general' thread to the overall .info domain issue. Just wanted to
> see if there were general ideas of how people combat this problem.
> Perhaps others do not see the volumes of spam that I do to notice the
> issue.
What I am (again!) missing, is the actual list of RCVD_IN_* rules hit.
Or, in other words, the DNS BL list providers that do result in a hit.
Absence of a few ones will show if your DNS is blocked.
So, which of these rules do trigger? How often?
And, again, there's no need to send a private copy. On-list only is
sufficient. I do read this list, no reason you would want to end up
on-list *and* in my Inbox, right?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
