On 11/6/10 3:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
don't forget the tflag 'noautolearn' since there are HIGHLY LIKELY to
send emails that would otherwise trigger SA.
(which is why they are in this list.)
header SPAMHAUS_SWL eval:check_rbl('SPAMHAUS_SWL', 'swl.spamhaus.org.')
describe SPAMHAUS_SWL Sender is whitelised by Spamhaus
tflags SPAMHAUS_SWL net nice
score SPAMHAUS_SWL -2.5
urirhsbl SPAMHAUS_DWL _vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org. A
body SPAMHAUS_DWL eval:check_uridnsbl('SPAMHAUS_DWL')
describe SPAMHAUS_DWL Domain is whitelisted by Spamhaus
tflags SPAMHAUS_DWL net nice
score SPAMHAUS_DWL -2.5
Set the scores to your own liking.
Bill
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
