On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:07 -0500, Rob McEwen wrote: > On 11/11/2010 7:41 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > > Really? I don't use SPF in SA, only MTA, if that's the case, it is a > > shame that SA also is behind the times. It was years ago SPF type was > > ratified. Justin: Any plans to change that? > > I guess I'm one of those mail admins who is behind the times. But I > don't really care that much because I take the same position as Suresh > Ramasubramanian... that SPF is a failed technology because, for one, it
Please keep your usual anti spf rants to yourself, no offence, but it is an official RR, there for it should be supported regardless of if you like or detest it, yes SPF is like a religious war. Oh and for the record I've never seen any problems with forwarding, ever, but YMMV, that is NOT what my post was about. .
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
